Which? reports inconsistent results from rapid home vitamin D tests
Health · First reported 30 Oct, 00:01 · Updated 07:03

Which? compared five rapid home vitamin D tests with a laboratory blood test and found varied results; it advised people concerned about their levels to seek professional advice. The MHRA said it was reviewing regulations for self-tests.
- Which? compared five rapid home tests with a laboratory test taken by the same person on the same day, and reported significant variation in results.
- The laboratory test showed a sufficient vitamin D level; the five rapid tests produced two insufficient, two deficient and one sufficient result.
- Which? shared its findings with the MHRA, which said it was reviewing regulations; Which? advised people concerned about their levels to consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Summary written by Lux AI from 2 articles
Key facts
- Kits tested
- Five rapid tests, each costing around £8.
- Comparison
- The same person’s results were checked against a CQC-registered laboratory test taken the same day.
- Laboratory result
- Vitamin D levels were within a sufficient range.
- Rapid-test results
- Two indicated insufficient levels, two indicated deficiency and one indicated sufficient levels.
- Regulatory response
- The MHRA said it was reviewing existing regulations, with proposed changes intended to raise standards for self-tests.
Source spectrum
Left 1 · Centre 1 · Right 0 of 2 rated sources
Images from the coverage


All coverage
- At-home vitamin D tests returning ‘unreliable’ results30 Oct, 06:35
Coverage over time
LeftCentreRight
Articles per hour since first reported, by side.
Ownership
- Corporation 50% (1)
- Unknown 50% (1)
Share of the 2 sources by owner type.